Economists at Goldman Sachs laid out an optimistic scenario for AI adoption, suggesting the technology could create more jobs than it destroys.

How AI Could Eliminate 4 Million Jobs Annually Without Significantly Rattling the Labor Market

Diccon Hyatt

Full Bio Diccon Hyatt is an experienced financial and economics reporter. He's written hundreds of articles breaking down complex financial topics in plain language, emphasizing the impact that economic currents would have on individuals' finances and the market. He has a Bachelor's degree in English from the University of Delaware.

Learn about our editorial policies

Published April 30, 2026

05:05 AM EDT

A pair of skybridges connecting modern glass buildings in an urban setting

Facade of the offices of artificial intelligence company OpenAI in San Francisco, California, with detail view of skybridges, March 25, 2026. Smith Collection / Gado / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

Artificial intelligence software may reduce job growth by 1 million to 4 million jobs each year, but create more than that, economists at Goldman Sachs said.
Jobs that were threatened by past waves of automation, such as fitness instructors and real estate agents, have continued to grow.
AI could create work for people using AI, as well as boost demand for service workers by raising incomes.

Get personalized, AI-powered answers built on 27+ years of trusted expertise.

AI may take your job, but it may ultimately create more positions than it eliminates.

At least, that's what economists at Goldman Sachs are banking on. Researchers at the investment bank published a report in late February predicting AI would not cause a "job apocalypse."

Instead, they outlined an optimistic case for the effect of artificial intelligence software on the labor market in which the technology takes over millions of jobs, but millions more are created to make up for them, keeping unemployment low.1

The paper was something of a rebuttal to a viral report from Citrini Research that rattled markets by outlining a scenario in which AI software replaces so many human workers that it crashes the economy.2

What This Means For The Economy

If Goldman Sachs economists are correct, fears about AI causing mass unemployment are overblown.

Get personalized, AI-powered answers built on 27+ years of trusted expertise.

Goldman did not disagree that AI could be massively disruptive. The technology will displace anywhere from 1 million to just over 4 million jobs annually in the years ahead, Joseph Briggs, global economist for Goldman, wrote. Despite that, Goldman does not believe AI will significantly raise the unemployment rate.

"The U.S. economy creates more than 30 million gross new jobs per year, and technological change is the main driver of long-run employment growth," Briggs wrote. "We expect that these dynamics will repeat and AI will create new jobs while it destroys others. We therefore do not anticipate a job apocalypse."

Related Education

[Generative AI: How It Works and Recent Transformative Developments

Sam Altman CEO of OpenAI, sitting on a podium with OpenAI sign behind him ](https://www.investopedia.com/generative-ai-7497939) [Structural Unemployment: Definition, Causes, and Examples

Structural Unemployment: A longer-lasting form of unemployment caused by fundamental shifts in an economy. ](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/structuralunemployment.asp)

AI could create jobs by improving efficiency, opening up new positions for people to use AI tools, and creating demand for service workers by boosting incomes, he wrote.

Indeed, Briggs dug through economic data and found no evidence that AI has, so far, caused significant job losses outside a few specific occupations, such as software development. He also argued that just because AI can do a job doesn't mean humans won't still be needed, even for the very same role, if history is any guide.

"Employment of fitness instructors (who were replaceable in the 1980s by fitness tapes and even more so today with the proliferation of fitness apps) and real estate agents (whose role as an intermediary has largely been replaced by online platforms) has outperformed overall employment both recently and over the last 25 years," he wrote.

Overall, Goldman laid out a scenario for AI that repeats the pattern of past technological advancements, citing the research of MIT professor David Autor, who found that 60% of the jobs in 2018 did not exist in 1940.3

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at

tips@investopedia.com

Get personalized, AI-powered answers built on 27+ years of trusted expertise.

Article Sources

Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.